Reviewed, flagged route which has a good replacement still available on site
Llanlla three (Llandudno to L. Junction) has been reviewed and iteratively rewritten to first tighten GPS and then fix an access problem. Although the author has flagged versions 1 and 2 they are still showing on the site.
Can both routes be taken down please?
It also occurred to me was that when I was looking at the page for Llanlla three I could see the other 2 existed but not what the ratings were or whether they were flagged. I wanted to check them out so I had to click through and read the details, and then click back to compare with version 3 again because I wasn't quite clear what the difference was. I don't think I would have bothered if the small summary boxes showed up a flag or low star rating. If they can be visible wouldn't people be more efficiently sent to the better routes?
It was also a bit confusing because the reviewer was being very kind and had given the (technically unusable) routes a 3 and 4 star rating when I would have cold-heartedly dropped them both to a 1. That might be you could kind of still use either if going from north to south as you were funnelled into a functioning alternative. You might need a map or app for the final bit though. It wouldn't work out so well the other way. Could you avoid this by prompting reviewers to give a 1 or 2 star (fails?) ratings to routes when they flag them. Perhaps better than forcing, say if a path was only going to be open at particular times or was only temporarily blocked.
0
-
Thanks Daisy for your suggestions. I've removed Llanlla one and two from the network. There's more of an explanation in the Denmol thread.
Thanks for your suggestion about ratings showing on other versions of the route when you're in the route page. It's something we're working on as we agree it would be really helpful.Best wishes,
Cristie0 -
Well that was quick! ;-)
0 -
Yes, lots of development going on just now :)
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments