
Jane Taylor
- Total activity 100
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 1 user
- Votes 54
- Subscriptions 31
Activity overview
Latest activity by Jane Taylor-
Jane Taylor commented,
I like the suggestion of middle of edge opposite North Hanover Street - around where the tall Christmas tree decoration is.
-
Jane Taylor commented,
Thanks David! I'm always trying to tweak to make things better!!
-
Jane Taylor created a post,
Glasgow - George Square
I think the meeting place in Glasgow should be moved to George Square grid ref NS 59264 65412 I'm testing routes here, and it feels like a proper destination, somewhere that shows Glasgow is a maj...
-
Jane Taylor commented,
This is a helpful conversation (or maybe two conversations!) and good to know other people encountering similar issues. David - your initial question about looking at the route line in advance - I ...
-
Jane Taylor created a post,
Twickenham
Twickenham Meeting Point was set based on the old station layout. Now that the station rebuilding work is complete it should be moved a short distance to reflect the new layout. There is a great ...
-
Jane Taylor created a post,
Kingston Vale
This is a bit nit picky, but current MP is just a random bit of pavement outside someone's house, and can be improved. 2 options, I've put proposed new MP GR by each: Option 1) TQ 21286 72260 Sinc...
-
Jane Taylor commented,
Worth creating a bug report if it's still a problem, that's the best way to alert Darren (who does the website).
-
Jane Taylor commented,
For your comments about difficulties using the website to get routes downloaded/printed off: it may be worth putting a more detailed comment into the 'general discussion' area of the forum to see i...
-
Jane Taylor commented,
No problem reviewing route whichever direction you walk it - and it's good practice to state direction of walk in any reviews.
-
Jane Taylor commented,
As David says, it's a problem which occurs when the website is having an upgrade. I encountered it last week and raised a bug report, that was the reply.